|
::monday, november the third, two thousand and three
ANDREW SPICER BLOGS OVERTIME, responding to Kathy's shot at Miller on the Minto issue, on John Nunziata's rather melodramatic intimations of attempted bribery:
|
For the most part, this is good news for John Tory. However, it does open up a bit of a risk. Now that Nunziata no longer has a police gag request hanging over him, he may come out with very frank details about what actually happened. This may include embarrasing details that aren't specifically in violation of the law. Either that, or Nunziata will keep quiet and swallow a great deal of embarrasment himself.
|
...and on tonight's CFRB candidates debate. His support for Miller remains unshaken, but there are always those nagging doubts:
|
I wish David Miller would commit to a TTC fare freeze. It's important to me and I think it's the best policy. Not that I think that any of the other candidates are more commited to the TTC than he is.
|
With a week left, I wonder if any of the bloggers currently posting - almost all of whom are decided without ambivalence - will have a change of heart, whether we'll see a dramatic conversion, or loss of faith. Sorry for the religious rhetoric, but if I've learned one thing in life, it's that faith is as essential to political belief as spiritual conviction.
- Rick McGinnis - 11:59pm - link
- - -
ANTHONY OF THE MEATRIARCHY on the Toronto Island issue:
|
One thing that most people are unaware of is that Toronto Island isn't really an island. It's a peninsula. In the late 1800s a storm washed out the narrowest part of the peninsula that connected it to the rest of the mainland. The "island" was thus born. Establishing a fixed link would be only recreating what existed in nature long before man arrived on the scene.
|
- Rick McGinnis - 11:49pm - link
- - -
JOEY DE VILLA OF ACCORDION GUY joins the fray with what I can only call a shot at Kathy Shaidle, prompted by her two election posts, linked from here. Joey writes:
|
Kathy Shaidle, author of the blog Relapsed Catholic seems to have switched to a different brand of Catholicism than the one I'm familiar with. She's somewhere between Supply Side Jesus and Gated Community Jesus.
|
Since it's clear enough that voters - and our representative sample of bloggers - have polarized into two distinct camps (Tory and Miller, in a nutshell), this was probably inevitable. Hey - Kathy's a big girl, and she can defend herself, and I'm sure the tone of her posts was meant to offend, if only to raise the stakes in what threatened to be a polite "exchange of ideas".
Nevertheless, David Janes weighed in not long afterward with a defense of Kathy, or rather of the conservative position on multiculturalism:
|
What I (and many others) object to about multiculturalism (as the phrase is used in the Canadian political context) is that it’s intent is to be divisive. Multiculturalism is not people living, working, and partying together in peace from places all around the world. Multiculturalism is keeping Canadians partitioned into separate non-overlapping communities, each community practicing some form of caricature of their "native" culture such as their "community-leaders" deem it.
|
What's my position? Well, I'm a little bit country, a little bit rock and roll on this. And I'm the kind of evil bastard who's not-so-secretly glad that folks have already started arguing. I guess you just have to know my family...
- Rick McGinnis - 11:45pm - link
- - -
DAVID JANES OF RANTING AND ROARING on the always divisive homeless issue which, in the neighbourhood where he works (Queen and Spadina), has manifested itself in two classes of indigent: the afflicted and the "lifestyle" homeless. This is sure to ruffle a few feathers:
|
All this is reversible — Rudolf Guliani proved this in the 1990’s in New York City — if anyone cares to admit the problem exists and is willing to differentiate between the different types of homelessness we are facing. Many don’t care to make the distinction, either because of a certain type of social myopia or because, as mentioned at the top of this posting, they see it method to get money spent on their people for their issues. These people do not want to fix our homeless problem: they want to install it.
|
- Rick McGinnis - 01:02pm - link
- - -
BECAUSE I ASKED, KATHY SHAIDLE OF RELAPSED CATHOLIC on David Miller, friend of Kennedys everywhere:
|
I hear Miller is a big hypocrite (surprise!). He told Yonge & Eg residents he opposed the Minto scheme, then went and supported it behind their backs. More union-loving tactics? Anyway, Miller's new best friend is arch-NIMBY RFK, Jr - must be where he's learning his two-faced tricks.
|
- Rick McGinnis - 12:09pm - link
- - -
BRETT LAMB ON THE SOBERING SPECTACLE of Tom Jakobek' bid for office, which began as a droll joke, and quickly went from funny ha-ha to funny sad:
|
The fatal flaw of the campaign seems to be the decision to present Tom as a friendly, smiling, happy guy. Do you think of "happy" and "friendly" when the name "Tom Jakobek" is mentioned? I don't. I doubt many people do. By trying to present him in that light, the ads themselves seem deceptive. We know Tom Jakobek and those ads are no Tom Jakobek.
|
Of course, the lynchpin could be that everyone - except Tom - seems to understand that this election is about change, sharp and fast, and that Jakobek, the City Hall drone that not even the dronemasters could love, hardly offers much of a prospect of change. If change wasn't the issue, we'd still have Case Ootes in the race, perish the thought.
- Rick McGinnis - 12:05pm - link
- - -
DAVID JANES OF RANTING AND ROARING on Barbara Hall's campaign, which has gone from front of the pack to distant third in the past month:
|
What makes this mayoral race interesting is that the implosion of the Barbara Hall campaign. Just a few weeks ago she had as good as a sure thing as one could get; now she’ll be lucky to come third place. Why this happened is somewhat interesting, a little window into the soul of the Canadian electorate. For the last ten years (and probably long before that) Canadians have been happy to have their country, their provinces and their cities run on autopilot. Witness, for example, the back-to-back election wins of brain-addled refrigerator-booster Mel Lastman. Toronto is a big city with big city problems that require sharp management, innovative approaches and not a little Gordian-knot cutting to solve. Nonetheless, we were happy enough to have good-old Mel up there, standing on a pile of telephone books telling us that we’re great — just look at all the fiberglass Moose standing about! World Crass, baby.
|
Hall, who was once mayor of a much smaller Toronto, and lost not only the battle against municipal amalgamation but the first megacity election against Mel Lastman, took only about a week to remind voters of her stultifying public persona and uncertain stances on major issues, neither of which are what you'd call advantages in a race this closely contested. I, for one, am rather grateful, and based on the intentions of the bloggers involved in this site, it's a Miller/Tory race. It's interesting, to me at least, how quickly the race has moved from the "primary" phase (it's anyone's game) to a presidential phase (it's a two party system, as Kodos told Homer.)
- Rick McGinnis - 08:57am - link
UPDATE: ANTHONY OF THE MEATRIARCHY on Hall, and Miller's union connections:
|
Miller's union connections are becoming more scrutinized as the polling date nears and other candidates hone their attacks on him. Interestingly Barbara Hall seems to be dropping like a stone and doesn't warrant a mention among the "front runners" any more. The tone of the media seems to be that it is a close race between Miller and John Tory. Hall didn't even show up to a debate yesterday - hardly the best move for someone who needs to get her campaign back on track.
|
- - -
COURTESY BRETT LAMB, HERE'S ANOTHER FINE CARTOON on the aftermath of ex-mayor Mel Lastman's reign. Looking back on the life and career of Mayor Mel, I think a cartoon is the only fitting medium with which to capture the man's essence. Something between an old Classics Illustrated and a Robert Williams panel, all popping eyes, jets of flopsweat and little demons nibbling at the edges of the frame...
- Rick McGinnis - 12:34am - link
- - -
ANDREW SPICER, A MILLER SUPPORTER, has voluntarily added himself to the band of pilgrims affiliated with this site. He's written a number of posts on the election already (just scroll down from the link above), but his most recent, on the Island Airport issue, makes an essential point about participatory democracy that - in my apparently "parochial" frame of mind - I find no reason to find anything but inspirational, at least when contemplating local politics:
|
When the special interests that hope to profit from the airport expansion try to tell you that you don't have a say, or that it's too late, tell them they're wrong. Don't fall for their scare tactics. This decision is entirely in the hands of elected officials, and they are responsible. Make them respect your wishes.
|
- Rick McGinnis - 12:22am - link
YESTERDAY
|